LIBF logo
Share page
Share on LinkedinShare on TwitterShare on Facebook
LIBF logo
Debt and what’s next
Introduction
A year of living dangerously
In this special series of articles, Financial World focuses on debt and what’s next for the UK economy as it struggles to recover from the damage caused by the Covid pandemic. Ouida Taaffe starts with an overview of some related economic problems
Economists, it has been suggested, are the people who say: “That’s all very well in practice, but will it work in theory?” They don’t (normally) do empiricism – for good reason. Suddenly, though, economists are having to experiment, and on a grand scale. They are pulling all the levers at their disposal to try to manage what happens when you power down major economies for close to a year and ramp up government debt to pay for it.
Fighting coronavirus has been compared to a war, but in wartime developed countries boost production massively and head to full employment. The pandemic has throttled both supply and demand. UK GDP in Q4 2020 was around 10% lower than in Q4 2019, according to the Bank of England – the biggest year-on-year decline since 1920. Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England governor, said in early January this year that it was hard to read the unemployment data at present, but the actual figure is probably closer to 6.5% than the official number of 4.9%. Unemployment has been held in check by furlough payments, but is expected to climb when they end this year.
In the meantime, money is being pumped into the economy to try to prevent businesses forced into lockdown from closing forever. There was £200bn of quantitative easing in 2020 and Bailey has said that another £150bn is expected this year. The government is also providing a wide range of economic support schemes.
The closer Bank rate gets to zero, the harder it is for banks to pass through interest rate cuts
Interest rates
When the crisis first broke, the Bank of England made a historic emergency cut in interest rates to 0.10%. It also reintroduced the term-funding scheme, with a focus on SMEs.
By November 2020, the Bank of England was reviewing moving to negative rates. Will it do it? Effective interest rates on new deposits and loans for non-financial companies are already below 2%. Before the financial crisis of 2007-08 that number was more than 7%, so companies that have refinanced over the past few months via government-guaranteed schemes should be more resilient than they were after the last crisis.
Banks hate the idea of a negative Bank rate. Just as importantly, there may be challenges in ensuring that businesses and consumers would benefit from it. The closer Bank rate gets to zero, the harder it is for banks to pass through interest rate cuts. That is why the Bank of England ran the original term-funding scheme from 2016 to 2018, which let lenders borrow from it at close to Bank rate. The Bank of England is considering negative rates, even though it would discomfort banks, because the economy is reeling from the blows of three lockdowns and needs support.
Silvana Tenreyro, an external member of the Monetary Policy Committee, gave a speech on negative interest rates on 11 January this year. She pointed out that negative rates had worked well, and even very well, in other countries in boosting monetary policy transmission. She also said that there was “no clear evidence” that negative Bank rates had cut overall bank profits. If nothing else, there have been effective negative rates in the past and some studies found that banks did better because the economy was boosted. But she added that the current structure of the UK banking system, which relies heavily on deposit funding, might mean a less positive outcome here.
Her overall assessment was that “negative interest rates should, with high likelihood, boost UK growth and inflation”. Andrew Bailey has said that the Bank of England will do whatever is necessary to meet its remit, but he has also said that “there are a lot of issues” with negative rates, which might lower lending to companies. The next announcement from the Monetary Policy Committee on interest rates is due on 4 February.
Over to the private sector
The Bank of England wants to give the economy time to recover from the pandemic, which is why so much quantitative easing has been done and interest rates have been cut. “If we had left the impact of this shock to play out over one year, the impact would have been unbearable. It would have been chaos,” Bailey said in a speech on 12 January. But, as Tenreyro pointed out, central banks can only do so much. They can set short-run interest rates, but structural factors such as ageing populations and a fall in productivity are not something they are able to fix. The heavy lifting on ensuring growth, productivity and employment comes down to the private sector.

Can companies quickly climb back out of the Covid trough – fast enough to prevent scarring to the economy – and can they then boost productivity? Cheap credit should put companies in a good position to invest, but many are struggling to survive. The Financial Conduct Authority announced in January 2020, for example, that around 4,000 financial firms were at heightened risk of failing – thanks to liquidity problems caused by the first wave of the pandemic. And small financial services firms are far from being the only ones in trouble. Non-food retail, hospitality and travel, for example, are all in difficulties – as are, by extension, the real estate companies that provide their premises.
It is hoped companies will use the cheap money to invest in more production, training and new technologies
The government has offered some breathing space for struggling businesses. It fast-tracked changes to insolvency law and has extended some temporary bankruptcy protections until 31 March this year. But default rates will inevitably rise. Highly leveraged companies are the most exposed to downturns. According to Leveraged Commentary & Data, defaults and debt restructurings in the European leveraged finance market hit an 11-year high in 2020, totalling €36.85bn – more than two and a half times the amount seen in 2019. The number of failures will only increase. S&P Global Ratings is predicting that the speculative-grade default rate in Europe will rise to around 8% this autumn.
Worldwide, the leverage loan market totals more than $2.2tn, according to the Bank of England. Some of that debt is securitised as collateralised loan obligations (CLOs). These raise spectres of the global financial crisis, when investors took huge losses on securitisations that contained dubious assets.
The Bank of England said in 2019 that UK banks had limited exposure to CLOs. But it also added: CLOs are complex products. It’s uncertain how resilient they will be to an economic stress, which could lead to unexpected losses for investors. So far in the pandemic – even though 2020 was an extraordinary year for CLOs, according to S&P – they have held up relatively well.
What about investment-grade corporate debt? Just as the hunt for yield has fired up the leveraged loan market, so it has made investment-grade bonds very attractive to investors. The riskiest investment-grade US corporate bonds, those rated BBB, had an effective yield of just over 2% in January 2020, according to the St Louis Fed.
The enthusiasm for corporate bonds is partly because the Federal Reserve boosted its quantitative easing, which reduced the amount of ‘safe’ bonds in the market. That enabled blue-chip US companies to go on a cheap borrowing spree. Even Google, which has a fat cash cushion, issued bonds. When it raised $10bn in August 2020, the interest rate on a five-year tranche was 0.45%, reported to be the lowest-ever coupon seen on a corporate bond with that maturity.
Google is unusual because it largely floats above the economic mayhem, but many other companies also raised money at very affordable rates. The Bank of America expects new issuance of investment-grade bonds in the US to be down by 76% this year.
Technology, jobs and productivity
What will companies do with the cheap money? Governments and central banks hope they will invest in greater productive capacity, training and new technologies – particularly around sustainability. If they don’t, things could get bumpy in a world of secular stagnation and climate change. But not all companies will find it easy to keep on funding a transition. Growing companies that put money into a new strategy can usually hold off paying dividends. They will still be able to attract investors looking for the next Google. Mature companies like banks are a different matter. The Bank of England dropped its effective ban on UK banks paying dividends and making share buybacks in December 2020 because of that issue.
It may be, though, that governments and regulators will not let this crisis go to waste and decide to experiment with radical policies that strongly encourage companies to tackle some of the tough challenges ahead. Government debt has to be paid for at some point – by tomorrow’s taxpayers, as Ben Broadbent, deputy governor for monetary policy at the Bank of England, points out.
The other articles in this section cover different aspects of how debt is affecting the economy and what might come next.
Ouida Taaffe
Ouida Taaffe is the editor of Financial World
Follow us
Data protection
© The London Institute of Banking & Finance 2021 - All rights reserved